Classification of ventricular septal defects for the Eleventh Iteration of the International Classification of Diseases - striving for consensus: A report from the International Society for Nomenclature of Paediatric and Congenital Heart Disease

Leo Lopez, Lucile Houyel, Steven D Colan, Robert H Anderson, Marie J Béland, Vera D Aiello, Frederique Bailliard, Meryl S Cohen, Jeffrey P Jacobs, Hiromi Kurosawa, Stephen P Sanders, Henry L Walters, Paul M Weinberg, Jeffrey R Boris, Andrew C Cook, Adrian Crucean, Allen D Everett, J William Gaynor, Jorge Giroud, Kristine J GuleserianMarina L Hughes, Amy L Juraszek, Otto N Krogmann, Bohdan J Maruszewski, James D St Louis, Stephen P Seslar, Diane E Spicer, Shubhika Srivastava, Giovanni Stellin, Christo I Tchervenkov, Lianyi Wang, Rodney C G Franklin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The definition and classification of ventricular septal defects have been fraught with controversy. The International Society for Nomenclature of Paediatric and Congenital Heart Disease is a group of international specialists in pediatric cardiology, cardiac surgery, cardiac morphology, and cardiac pathology that has met annually for the past nine years in an effort to unify by consensus the divergent approaches to describe ventricular septal defects. These efforts have culminated in acceptance of the classification system by the World Health Organization into the 11th Iteration of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). The scheme to categorize a ventricular septal defect utilizes both its location and the structures along its borders, thereby bridging the two most popular and disparate classification approaches and providing a common language for describing each phenotype. Although the first-order terms are based on the geographic categories of central perimembranous, inlet, trabecular muscular, and outlet defects, inlet and outlet defects are further characterized by descriptors that incorporate the borders of the defect, namely the perimembranous, muscular, and juxta-arterial types. The Society recognizes that it is equally valid to classify these defects by geography or borders, so the emphasis in this system is on the second-order terms that incorporate both geography and borders to describe each phenotype. The unified terminology should help the medical community describe with better precision all types of ventricular septal defects.

Original languageEnglish
JournalThe Annals of thoracic surgery
Early online date19 Jul 2018
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 19 Jul 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Classification of ventricular septal defects for the Eleventh Iteration of the International Classification of Diseases - striving for consensus: A report from the International Society for Nomenclature of Paediatric and Congenital Heart Disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this