Abstract
Governance network managers are charged with triggering and sustaining collaborative dynamics, but often struggle to do so because they come from and interact with hierarchical and competitive organizations and systems. Thus, an important step toward effectively managing governance networks is to clarify collaborative dynamics. While the recently proposed collaborative governance regime (CGR) model provides a good start, it lacks both the conceptual clarity and parsimony needed in a useful analytical tool. This theoretical chapter uses the logic model framework to assess and reorganize the CGR model and then amends it using Follett’s theory of integrative process to provide a parsimonious understanding of collaborative dynamics as opposed to authoritative coordination or negotiated cooperation. Uniquely, Follett draws from political and organizational theory practically grounded in the study of civic and business groups to frame the manner in which integrative process permeates collaboration. We argue that the disposition, style of relating, and mode of association in her integrative method foster collaborative dynamics while avoiding the counterproductive characteristics of hierarchy and competition. We develop an alternative logic model for studying collaborative dynamics that clarifies and defines these dynamics for future operationalization and empirical study.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | From Austerity to Abundance? |
Subtitle of host publication | Creative Approaches to Coordinating the Common Good |
Editors | Margaret Stout |
Place of Publication | Bingley |
Publisher | Emerald |
Pages | 91-115 |
Number of pages | 25 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9781787144651 |
ISBN (Print) | 9781787144668 |
Publication status | Published - 2018 |
Keywords
- Collaborative governance
- Integrative Governance
- integration
- network management
- process evaluation
- Follett