Chlorine removal from the pyrolysis of urban polyolefinic waste in a semi-batch reactor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard

Chlorine removal from the pyrolysis of urban polyolefinic waste in a semi-batch reactor. / Torres, D.; Jiang, Y.; Sanchez Monsalve, D. A.; Leeke, G. A.

In: Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, Vol. 9, No. 1, 104920, 02.2021.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{bc4aa6510abb4615a6743720fed68edc,
title = "Chlorine removal from the pyrolysis of urban polyolefinic waste in a semi-batch reactor",
abstract = "The pyrolysis of urban chlorine-containing polyolefinic plastic waste with simultaneous retention of HCl is investigated. Different chemical removers based on sodium, calcium and zinc bases, and different adsorbents based on alumina or zeolites were used inside the reactor or in downstream hot filters, respectively, for chlorine removal and upgrading of pyrolysis oils. Initially, polyolefin waste (POW, containing a 98.5 wt% polyolefins) was thermogravimetrically pyrolyzed to determine its thermal behaviour. Subsequently, chemical removers were mixed with the POW which was pyrolyzed at 480 °C in a semi-batch reactor. The adsorbents were tested separately in hot filters (300 ± 20 °C) downstream of the pyrolysis reactor. After the pyrolysis, the resulting char containing the chemical removers and the absorbents in the hot filters were analysed by FTIR, CHN elemental analysis and ESEM-EDS to determine their respective chlorine contents. The highest chlorine retention was 23.8 wt% for chemical remover when used in direct contact with POW, while a zeolite used in the hot filter (gas streams) gave a chlorine retention of 65.6 wt%. The pyrolytic liquids consisted of mixtures of C7-C40 hydrocarbons made up of olefinic and aliphatic hydrocarbons with a very low presence of aromatics (estimated to be below 3 wt% by HPLC). In most cases, the chlorine removal processes resulted in waxier pyrolytic oils and with a higher degree of branching. ",
keywords = "Chlorine removal, Dehydrochlorination of plastic waste, Hydrochloric acid removers, Plastic pyrolytic oils, Polyolefinic waste treatment, Pyrolysis of chlorinated plastic waste",
author = "D. Torres and Y. Jiang and {Sanchez Monsalve}, {D. A.} and Leeke, {G. A.}",
note = "Funding Information: The funding to support this research was awarded by Innovate UK Energy Catalyst 4. D.T. is thankful for his contract funded by this Project. D.A.S.M and RT are thankful for the H2020 SME Innovation Programme and the European Commission for training in industrial innovation management. Cranfield University thanks the technical assistance received from the Recycling Technologies Ltd company throughout the project.",
year = "2021",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1016/j.jece.2020.104920",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering",
issn = "2213-3437",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Chlorine removal from the pyrolysis of urban polyolefinic waste in a semi-batch reactor

AU - Torres, D.

AU - Jiang, Y.

AU - Sanchez Monsalve, D. A.

AU - Leeke, G. A.

N1 - Funding Information: The funding to support this research was awarded by Innovate UK Energy Catalyst 4. D.T. is thankful for his contract funded by this Project. D.A.S.M and RT are thankful for the H2020 SME Innovation Programme and the European Commission for training in industrial innovation management. Cranfield University thanks the technical assistance received from the Recycling Technologies Ltd company throughout the project.

PY - 2021/2

Y1 - 2021/2

N2 - The pyrolysis of urban chlorine-containing polyolefinic plastic waste with simultaneous retention of HCl is investigated. Different chemical removers based on sodium, calcium and zinc bases, and different adsorbents based on alumina or zeolites were used inside the reactor or in downstream hot filters, respectively, for chlorine removal and upgrading of pyrolysis oils. Initially, polyolefin waste (POW, containing a 98.5 wt% polyolefins) was thermogravimetrically pyrolyzed to determine its thermal behaviour. Subsequently, chemical removers were mixed with the POW which was pyrolyzed at 480 °C in a semi-batch reactor. The adsorbents were tested separately in hot filters (300 ± 20 °C) downstream of the pyrolysis reactor. After the pyrolysis, the resulting char containing the chemical removers and the absorbents in the hot filters were analysed by FTIR, CHN elemental analysis and ESEM-EDS to determine their respective chlorine contents. The highest chlorine retention was 23.8 wt% for chemical remover when used in direct contact with POW, while a zeolite used in the hot filter (gas streams) gave a chlorine retention of 65.6 wt%. The pyrolytic liquids consisted of mixtures of C7-C40 hydrocarbons made up of olefinic and aliphatic hydrocarbons with a very low presence of aromatics (estimated to be below 3 wt% by HPLC). In most cases, the chlorine removal processes resulted in waxier pyrolytic oils and with a higher degree of branching.

AB - The pyrolysis of urban chlorine-containing polyolefinic plastic waste with simultaneous retention of HCl is investigated. Different chemical removers based on sodium, calcium and zinc bases, and different adsorbents based on alumina or zeolites were used inside the reactor or in downstream hot filters, respectively, for chlorine removal and upgrading of pyrolysis oils. Initially, polyolefin waste (POW, containing a 98.5 wt% polyolefins) was thermogravimetrically pyrolyzed to determine its thermal behaviour. Subsequently, chemical removers were mixed with the POW which was pyrolyzed at 480 °C in a semi-batch reactor. The adsorbents were tested separately in hot filters (300 ± 20 °C) downstream of the pyrolysis reactor. After the pyrolysis, the resulting char containing the chemical removers and the absorbents in the hot filters were analysed by FTIR, CHN elemental analysis and ESEM-EDS to determine their respective chlorine contents. The highest chlorine retention was 23.8 wt% for chemical remover when used in direct contact with POW, while a zeolite used in the hot filter (gas streams) gave a chlorine retention of 65.6 wt%. The pyrolytic liquids consisted of mixtures of C7-C40 hydrocarbons made up of olefinic and aliphatic hydrocarbons with a very low presence of aromatics (estimated to be below 3 wt% by HPLC). In most cases, the chlorine removal processes resulted in waxier pyrolytic oils and with a higher degree of branching.

KW - Chlorine removal

KW - Dehydrochlorination of plastic waste

KW - Hydrochloric acid removers

KW - Plastic pyrolytic oils

KW - Polyolefinic waste treatment

KW - Pyrolysis of chlorinated plastic waste

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098223436&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jece.2020.104920

DO - 10.1016/j.jece.2020.104920

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85098223436

VL - 9

JO - Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering

JF - Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering

SN - 2213-3437

IS - 1

M1 - 104920

ER -