Can investors restrict managerial investment behavior in distressed firms?

Oksana Pryshchepa, Kevin Aretz, Shantanu Banerjee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)
145 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this article, we show that only distressed firms not identified as distressed by creditors are able to transfer wealth from creditors to shareholders. Using the number of years to future bankruptcy as a proxy for genuine distress and measures based on observable firm characteristics as proxies for perceived distress, genuinely distressed firms incorrectly perceived as healthy cut payouts to shareholders more slowly and invest more aggressively as uncertainty increases than correctly identified distressed firms. Consistent with the idea that incorrectly identified distressed firms actively hide their troubles, we show that they tend to follow more aggressive accounting policies and often resort to earnings misstatements. We also show that they are often not restricted by covenants and can borrow further debt capital at affordable rates, suggesting that a lack of monitoring by creditors allows them to transfer wealth to shareholders.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)222-239
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Corporate Finance
Volume23
Early online date28 Aug 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2013

Keywords

  • Agency conflicts
  • Financial distress
  • Expected volatility
  • Firm investment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Can investors restrict managerial investment behavior in distressed firms?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this