Biased towards food: Electrophysiological evidence for biased attention to food stimuli

Sanjay Kumar, Suzanne Higgs, Femke Rutters, Glyn W Humphreys

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)
229 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We investigated the neural mechanisms involved in bias for food stimuli in our visual environment using event related lateralized (ERL) responses. The participants were presented with a cue (food or non-food item) to either identify or hold in working memory. Subsequently, they had to search for a target in a 2-item display where target and distractor stimuli were each flanked by a picture of a food or a non-food item. The behavioural data showed that performance was strongly affected by food cues, especially when food was held in WM compared to when the cues were merely identified. The temporal dynamics of electrophysiological measures of attention (the N1pc and N2pc) showed that the orienting of attention towards food stimuli was associated with two different mechanisms; an early stage of attentional suppression followed by a later stage of attentional orienting towards food stimuli. In contrast, non-food cues were associated only with the guidance of attention to or away from cued stimuli on valid and invalid trials. The results demonstrate that food items, perhaps due to their motivational significance modulate the early orienting of attention, including an initial suppressive response to food items.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBrain and Cognition
Early online date4 May 2016
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 4 May 2016

Keywords

  • Attention
  • Working memory
  • Food and non-food cues
  • N2pc
  • Event related potentials

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Biased towards food: Electrophysiological evidence for biased attention to food stimuli'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this