Best–worst scaling: What it can do for health care research and how to do it

T Flynn, J Louviere, T Peters, Joanna Coast

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    442 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Statements like "quality of care is more highly valued than waiting time" can neither be supported nor refuted by comparisons of utility parameters from a traditional discrete choice experiment (DCE). Best--worst scaling can overcome this problem because it asks respondents to perform a different choice task. However, whilst the nature of the best--worst task is generally understood, there are a number of issues relating to the design and analysis of a best--worst choice experiment that require further exposition. This paper illustrates how to aggregate and analyse such data and using a quality of life pilot study demonstrates how richer insights can be drawn by the use of best--worst tasks.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)171-189
    Number of pages19
    JournalJournal of Health Economics
    Volume26
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2007

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Best–worst scaling: What it can do for health care research and how to do it'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this