Assessment of anger-related cognitions of people with intellectual disabilities

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

Assessment of anger-related cognitions of people with intellectual disabilities. / Christopher, Rose; Rose, John; Richardson, Charlotte; killeen, Stewart; Andrew, Jahodah,; Willner, Paul.

In: Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 28.03.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Christopher, Rose ; Rose, John ; Richardson, Charlotte ; killeen, Stewart ; Andrew, Jahodah, ; Willner, Paul. / Assessment of anger-related cognitions of people with intellectual disabilities. In: Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy. 2016.

Bibtex

@article{92fde0a66dcb4e30946e7ca79279dfd7,
title = "Assessment of anger-related cognitions of people with intellectual disabilities",
abstract = "BackgroundInterventions for anger represent the largest body of research on the adaptation of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for people with intellectual disabilities. The extent to which the effectiveness of these interventions reflects the behavioural or cognitive components of CBT is uncertain. This arises in part because there are few measures of anger-related cognitions. MethodThe Profile of Anger-related Cognitions (PAC) is built around interpersonal scenarios that the participant identifies as personally anger-provoking, and was designed as an extension of the Profile of Anger Coping Skills (PACS). A conversational presentational style is used to approach ratings of anger experienced in those situations and of four relevant cognitive dimensions: attribution of hostile intent, unfairness, victimhood, and helplessness. The PAC, and other measures, including the PACS, was administered to (i) people with ID identified as having problems with anger control (n=12) and (ii) university students (n=23); its psychometric properties were investigated and content analyses were conducted of participants{\textquoteright} verbal responses. In a third study, clinicians (n=6) were surveyed for their impression of using the PAC in the assessment of clients referred for help with anger problems. ResultsThe PAC had good consistency and test-retest reliability, and the total score on the four cognitive dimensions correlated significantly with anger ratings but not with impersonal measures of anger disposition. The predominant cognitions reported were perceptions of unfairness and helplessness. People with ID and university students were in most respects very similar in both the psychometric analyses and the content analyses of their verbal responses. The PAC had high acceptability both to people with ID and to clinicians. ConclusionsThe PAC may be a useful instrument for both clinical and research purposes. Personal relevance and the conversational mode of administration are particular strengths.",
author = "Rose Christopher and John Rose and Charlotte Richardson and Stewart killeen and Jahodah, Andrew and Paul Willner",
year = "2016",
month = mar,
day = "28",
doi = "10.1017/S1352465816000059",
language = "English",
journal = "Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy",
issn = "1352-4658",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of anger-related cognitions of people with intellectual disabilities

AU - Christopher, Rose

AU - Rose, John

AU - Richardson, Charlotte

AU - killeen, Stewart

AU - Andrew, Jahodah,

AU - Willner, Paul

PY - 2016/3/28

Y1 - 2016/3/28

N2 - BackgroundInterventions for anger represent the largest body of research on the adaptation of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for people with intellectual disabilities. The extent to which the effectiveness of these interventions reflects the behavioural or cognitive components of CBT is uncertain. This arises in part because there are few measures of anger-related cognitions. MethodThe Profile of Anger-related Cognitions (PAC) is built around interpersonal scenarios that the participant identifies as personally anger-provoking, and was designed as an extension of the Profile of Anger Coping Skills (PACS). A conversational presentational style is used to approach ratings of anger experienced in those situations and of four relevant cognitive dimensions: attribution of hostile intent, unfairness, victimhood, and helplessness. The PAC, and other measures, including the PACS, was administered to (i) people with ID identified as having problems with anger control (n=12) and (ii) university students (n=23); its psychometric properties were investigated and content analyses were conducted of participants’ verbal responses. In a third study, clinicians (n=6) were surveyed for their impression of using the PAC in the assessment of clients referred for help with anger problems. ResultsThe PAC had good consistency and test-retest reliability, and the total score on the four cognitive dimensions correlated significantly with anger ratings but not with impersonal measures of anger disposition. The predominant cognitions reported were perceptions of unfairness and helplessness. People with ID and university students were in most respects very similar in both the psychometric analyses and the content analyses of their verbal responses. The PAC had high acceptability both to people with ID and to clinicians. ConclusionsThe PAC may be a useful instrument for both clinical and research purposes. Personal relevance and the conversational mode of administration are particular strengths.

AB - BackgroundInterventions for anger represent the largest body of research on the adaptation of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for people with intellectual disabilities. The extent to which the effectiveness of these interventions reflects the behavioural or cognitive components of CBT is uncertain. This arises in part because there are few measures of anger-related cognitions. MethodThe Profile of Anger-related Cognitions (PAC) is built around interpersonal scenarios that the participant identifies as personally anger-provoking, and was designed as an extension of the Profile of Anger Coping Skills (PACS). A conversational presentational style is used to approach ratings of anger experienced in those situations and of four relevant cognitive dimensions: attribution of hostile intent, unfairness, victimhood, and helplessness. The PAC, and other measures, including the PACS, was administered to (i) people with ID identified as having problems with anger control (n=12) and (ii) university students (n=23); its psychometric properties were investigated and content analyses were conducted of participants’ verbal responses. In a third study, clinicians (n=6) were surveyed for their impression of using the PAC in the assessment of clients referred for help with anger problems. ResultsThe PAC had good consistency and test-retest reliability, and the total score on the four cognitive dimensions correlated significantly with anger ratings but not with impersonal measures of anger disposition. The predominant cognitions reported were perceptions of unfairness and helplessness. People with ID and university students were in most respects very similar in both the psychometric analyses and the content analyses of their verbal responses. The PAC had high acceptability both to people with ID and to clinicians. ConclusionsThe PAC may be a useful instrument for both clinical and research purposes. Personal relevance and the conversational mode of administration are particular strengths.

U2 - 10.1017/S1352465816000059

DO - 10.1017/S1352465816000059

M3 - Article

JO - Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy

JF - Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy

SN - 1352-4658

ER -