Are meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection targets fair to those with other types of healthcare-associated infection or cost-effective?

M Millar, Joanna Coast, R Ashcroft

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    20 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    UK Nation at Health Service Trust hospitals are required to report meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (MRSA BSI) and also have targets for their reduction. We argue that the MRSA BSI target influences local priorities, and that the high priority given to control of MRSA BSI is not fair or cost-effective when account is taken of the much larger number of patients who develop other types of serious hospital-acquired infection. Reasons for infection control priorities should be made explicit. Use of a formal and reasoned process of priority setting would also counteract the potential, distortion of local priorities by national targets. (c) 2008 The Hospital. Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All. rights reserved.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1-5
    Number of pages5
    JournalThe Journal of hospital infection
    Volume69
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2008

    Keywords

    • cost-effectiveness
    • MRSA
    • fairness
    • targets

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Are meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection targets fair to those with other types of healthcare-associated infection or cost-effective?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this