Approaching paradox: Loving and hating mega-events

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard

Approaching paradox: Loving and hating mega-events. / Muller, Martin.

In: Tourism Management, Vol. 63, 12.2017, p. 234-241.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{82c44e31119a4685851f05e61968b3ac,
title = "Approaching paradox: Loving and hating mega-events",
abstract = "This paper examines the role of paradoxes in research and proposes strategies of engaging with them. For this purpose, it analyses the ways in which six paradoxes are constitutive of sports mega-events such as the Olympic Games: the universalism paradox, the compliance paradox, the winner's paradox, the participation paradox, the uniqueness paradox and the passion paradox. It then develops three strategies of how researchers and practitioners can approach paradox. The first, exploration, examines the consequences and effects of the ambiguity of paradoxes. The second, differentiation, enquires into the spatio-temporal and social make-up of paradoxes. The third, reframing, recasts paradoxes by shifting theoretical perspectives. Instead of pressing to resolve paradoxes, researchers and practitioners alike should make productive use of their ambiguity.",
author = "Martin Muller",
year = "2017",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1016/j.tourman.2017.06.003",
language = "English",
volume = "63",
pages = "234--241",
journal = "Tourism Management",
issn = "0261-5177",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Approaching paradox: Loving and hating mega-events

AU - Muller, Martin

PY - 2017/12

Y1 - 2017/12

N2 - This paper examines the role of paradoxes in research and proposes strategies of engaging with them. For this purpose, it analyses the ways in which six paradoxes are constitutive of sports mega-events such as the Olympic Games: the universalism paradox, the compliance paradox, the winner's paradox, the participation paradox, the uniqueness paradox and the passion paradox. It then develops three strategies of how researchers and practitioners can approach paradox. The first, exploration, examines the consequences and effects of the ambiguity of paradoxes. The second, differentiation, enquires into the spatio-temporal and social make-up of paradoxes. The third, reframing, recasts paradoxes by shifting theoretical perspectives. Instead of pressing to resolve paradoxes, researchers and practitioners alike should make productive use of their ambiguity.

AB - This paper examines the role of paradoxes in research and proposes strategies of engaging with them. For this purpose, it analyses the ways in which six paradoxes are constitutive of sports mega-events such as the Olympic Games: the universalism paradox, the compliance paradox, the winner's paradox, the participation paradox, the uniqueness paradox and the passion paradox. It then develops three strategies of how researchers and practitioners can approach paradox. The first, exploration, examines the consequences and effects of the ambiguity of paradoxes. The second, differentiation, enquires into the spatio-temporal and social make-up of paradoxes. The third, reframing, recasts paradoxes by shifting theoretical perspectives. Instead of pressing to resolve paradoxes, researchers and practitioners alike should make productive use of their ambiguity.

U2 - 10.1016/j.tourman.2017.06.003

DO - 10.1016/j.tourman.2017.06.003

M3 - Article

VL - 63

SP - 234

EP - 241

JO - Tourism Management

JF - Tourism Management

SN - 0261-5177

ER -