Abstract
Objectives: The spectrum of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) is changing to include both nuclear staining as well as cytoplasmic and mitotic cell patterns (CMPs) and accordingly a change in terminology to anti-cellular antibodies. This study examined the prevalence of indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) anti-cellular antibody staining using the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics inception cohort.
Methods: Anti-cellular antibodies were detected by IIF on HEp-2000 substrate utilizing the baseline serum. Three serological subsets were examined: 1) ANA-positive (presence of either nuclear or mixed nuclear/CMP staining), 2) anti-cellular antibody-negative (absence of any intracellular staining), and 3) isolated CMP staining. The odds of being anti-cellular antibody-negative versus ANA
or isolated CMP-positive was assessed by multivariable analysis.
Results: 1137 patients were included; 1049/1137 (92.3%) were ANA-positive, 71/1137 (6.2%) were anti-cellular antibody-negative, and 17/1137 (1.5%) had isolated CMP. The isolated CMP group did not differ from the ANA-positive or anti-cellular antibody-negative group in clinical, demographic or serologic features. Patients who were older (OR 1.02 [95% CI: 1.00, 1.04]), of Caucasian
race/ethnicity (OR 3.53 [95% CI: 1.77, 7.03]), or on high dose glucocorticoids at or prior to enrolment (OR 2.39 [95% CI: 1.39, 4.12]) were more likely to be anti-cellular antibody-negative. Patients on immunosuppressants (OR 0.35 [95% CI: 0.19, 0.64]) or with anti-SSA/Ro60 (OR 0.41 [95% CI: 0.23, 0.74]) or anti-UI-RNP (OR 0.43 [95% CI: 0.20, 0.93]) were less likely to be anti-cellular antibodynegative.
Conclusions: In newly diagnosed SLE, 6.2% of patients were anti-cellular antibody-negative and 1.5% had isolated CMP. The prevalence of anti-cellular antibody-negative SLE will likely decrease as emerging nomenclature guidelines recommend that non-nuclear patterns should also be reported as a positive ANA.
Methods: Anti-cellular antibodies were detected by IIF on HEp-2000 substrate utilizing the baseline serum. Three serological subsets were examined: 1) ANA-positive (presence of either nuclear or mixed nuclear/CMP staining), 2) anti-cellular antibody-negative (absence of any intracellular staining), and 3) isolated CMP staining. The odds of being anti-cellular antibody-negative versus ANA
or isolated CMP-positive was assessed by multivariable analysis.
Results: 1137 patients were included; 1049/1137 (92.3%) were ANA-positive, 71/1137 (6.2%) were anti-cellular antibody-negative, and 17/1137 (1.5%) had isolated CMP. The isolated CMP group did not differ from the ANA-positive or anti-cellular antibody-negative group in clinical, demographic or serologic features. Patients who were older (OR 1.02 [95% CI: 1.00, 1.04]), of Caucasian
race/ethnicity (OR 3.53 [95% CI: 1.77, 7.03]), or on high dose glucocorticoids at or prior to enrolment (OR 2.39 [95% CI: 1.39, 4.12]) were more likely to be anti-cellular antibody-negative. Patients on immunosuppressants (OR 0.35 [95% CI: 0.19, 0.64]) or with anti-SSA/Ro60 (OR 0.41 [95% CI: 0.23, 0.74]) or anti-UI-RNP (OR 0.43 [95% CI: 0.20, 0.93]) were less likely to be anti-cellular antibodynegative.
Conclusions: In newly diagnosed SLE, 6.2% of patients were anti-cellular antibody-negative and 1.5% had isolated CMP. The prevalence of anti-cellular antibody-negative SLE will likely decrease as emerging nomenclature guidelines recommend that non-nuclear patterns should also be reported as a positive ANA.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Arthritis Care & Research |
| Early online date | 25 Jul 2018 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 25 Jul 2018 |