Animal research beyond the laboratory: Report from a workshop on places other than licensed establishments (POLEs) in the UK

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Authors

  • Alexandra Palmer
  • Beth Greenhough
  • Pru Hobson‐west
  • Reuben Message
  • James N. Aegerter
  • Zoe Belshaw
  • Ngaire Dennison
  • Roger Dickey
  • Julie Lane
  • Jamie Lorimer
  • Kate Millar
  • Chris Newman
  • Kirsten Pullen
  • Dominic J. Wells
  • Matthew J. Witt
  • Sarah Wolfensohn

Colleges, School and Institutes

External organisations

  • University of Oxford
  • University of Nottingham
  • Animal and Plant Health Agency
  • PDSA Nottingham
  • University of Dundee
  • Army Ornithological Society (AOS)
  • Wild Planet Trust
  • Royal Veterinary College University of London
  • University of Exeter
  • University of Surrey

Abstract

Research involving animals that occurs outside the laboratory raises an array of unique challenges. With regard to UK legislation, however, it receives only limited attention in terms of official guidelines, support, and statistics, which are unsurprisingly orientated towards the laboratory environment in which the majority of animal research takes place. In September 2019, four social scientists from the Animal Research Nexus program gathered together a group of 13 experts to discuss nonlaboratory research under the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act (A(SP)A) of 1986 (mirroring European Union (EU) Directive 2010/63/EU), which is the primary mechanism for regulating animal research in the UK. Such nonlaboratory research under the A(SP)A often occurs at Places Other than Licensed Establishments (POLEs). The primary objective of the workshop was to assemble a diverse group with experience across a variety of POLEs (e.g., wildlife field sites, farms, fisheries, veterinary clinics, zoos) to explore the practical, ethical, and regulatory challenges of conducting research at POLEs. While consensus was not sought, nor reached on every point of discussion, we collectively identified five key areas that we propose require further discussion and attention. These relate to: (1) support and training; (2) ethical review; (3) cultures of care, particularly in nonregulated research outside of the laboratory; (4) the setting of boundaries; and (5) statistics and transparency. The workshop generated robust discussion and thereby highlighted the value of focusing on the unique challenges posed by POLEs, and the need for further opportunities for exchanging experiences and sharing best practice relating to research projects outside of the laboratory in the UK and elsewhere.

Bibliographic note

Funding Information: Acknowledgments: We gratefully acknowledge support from the Wellcome Trust, which funds the Animal Research Nexus. For their support for running the workshop, we gratefully thank Keble College, University of Oxford. Funding Information: Funding: The Animal Research Nexus is funded by a five‐year Wellcome Trust Collaborative Award (WT205393/A/16/Z £1,633,835, 2017–2022). The POLEs workshop was funded by this award along with a Keble College Small Research Grant. Publisher Copyright: © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. Copyright: Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number1868
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalAnimals
Volume10
Issue number10
Publication statusPublished - 13 Oct 2020

Keywords

  • Animal research, Animal welfare, Farms, Fisheries, Governance, Policy, Veterinary medicine, Wildlife, Zoos