Analysing the ‘migrant work ethic’ – comparing managers’ perceptions of local workers and Central and Eastern European migrants in the United Kingdom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
221 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The 2004 expansion of the European Union saw over one million people from Central and Eastern Europe register to work in the United Kingdom. Early studies into this phenomenon found a highly qualified migrant workforce taking low skilled roles, and research in regions of high unemployment saw migrant workers viewed favourably by managers as compared with locals. Using a qualitative case study approach, this paper significantly adds to regional studies of migration to investigate comparisons of migrant and local workers in regions of low unemployment, where managerial views towards locals are not as negative. The paper finds that, owing to low levels of labour market power as a result of basic English language skills and problems of transferability of qualifications, migrants are finding new ways of signalling their higher productivity. These are low levels of absence and a willingness to work longer hours, frequently termed a ‘good work ethic’ by managers, and used to positively distinguish migrant workers even in regions of low unemployment. The paper then investigates what happens to the demonstration of this ‘work ethic’ over time, finding that these behaviours are less likely to be used as labour market power increases.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)442-452
Number of pages11
JournalEuropean Urban and Regional Studies
Volume24
Issue number4
Early online date12 Jan 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2017

Keywords

  • Employment relations
  • food manufacturing
  • migration
  • skills
  • temporary work
  • unemployment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Analysing the ‘migrant work ethic’ – comparing managers’ perceptions of local workers and Central and Eastern European migrants in the United Kingdom'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this