Algorithmic regulation: a critical interrogation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard

Algorithmic regulation : a critical interrogation. / Yeung, Karen.

In: Regulation & Governance, Vol. 12, No. 4, 12.2018, p. 505-523.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{fd7c683106e446eab98c0586fb8baed4,
title = "Algorithmic regulation: a critical interrogation",
abstract = "Innovations in networked digital communications technologies, including the rise of {\textquoteleft}Big Data{\textquoteright}, ubiquitous computing and cloud storage systems, may be giving rise to a new system of social ordering known as algorithmic regulation. Algorithmic regulation refers to decision-making systems that regulate a domain of activity in order to manage risk or alter behaviour through continual computational generation of knowledge by systematically collecting data (in real time on a continuous basis) emitted directly from numerous dynamic components pertaining to the regulated environment in order to identify and, if necessary, automatically refine (or prompt refinement of) the system{\textquoteright}s operations to attain a pre-specified goal. It provides a descriptive analysis of algorithmic regulation, classifying these decision-making systems as either reactive or pre-emptive, and offers a taxonomy that identifies 8 different forms of algorithmic regulation based on their configuration at each of the three stages of the cybernetic process: notably, at the level of standard setting (adaptive vs fixed behavioural standards); information-gathering and monitoring (historic data vs predictions based on inferred data) and at the level of sanction and behavioural change (automatic execution vs recommender systems). It maps the contours of several emerging debates surrounding algorithmic regulation, drawing upon insights from regulatory governance studies, legal critiques , surveillance studies and critical data studies to highlight various concerns about the legitimacy of algorithmic regulation",
keywords = "big data, algorithm, surveillance, enforcement, automation",
author = "Karen Yeung",
year = "2018",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1111/rego.12158",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "505--523",
journal = "Regulation & Governance",
issn = "1748-5983",
publisher = "Blackwell-Wiley",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Algorithmic regulation

T2 - a critical interrogation

AU - Yeung, Karen

PY - 2018/12

Y1 - 2018/12

N2 - Innovations in networked digital communications technologies, including the rise of ‘Big Data’, ubiquitous computing and cloud storage systems, may be giving rise to a new system of social ordering known as algorithmic regulation. Algorithmic regulation refers to decision-making systems that regulate a domain of activity in order to manage risk or alter behaviour through continual computational generation of knowledge by systematically collecting data (in real time on a continuous basis) emitted directly from numerous dynamic components pertaining to the regulated environment in order to identify and, if necessary, automatically refine (or prompt refinement of) the system’s operations to attain a pre-specified goal. It provides a descriptive analysis of algorithmic regulation, classifying these decision-making systems as either reactive or pre-emptive, and offers a taxonomy that identifies 8 different forms of algorithmic regulation based on their configuration at each of the three stages of the cybernetic process: notably, at the level of standard setting (adaptive vs fixed behavioural standards); information-gathering and monitoring (historic data vs predictions based on inferred data) and at the level of sanction and behavioural change (automatic execution vs recommender systems). It maps the contours of several emerging debates surrounding algorithmic regulation, drawing upon insights from regulatory governance studies, legal critiques , surveillance studies and critical data studies to highlight various concerns about the legitimacy of algorithmic regulation

AB - Innovations in networked digital communications technologies, including the rise of ‘Big Data’, ubiquitous computing and cloud storage systems, may be giving rise to a new system of social ordering known as algorithmic regulation. Algorithmic regulation refers to decision-making systems that regulate a domain of activity in order to manage risk or alter behaviour through continual computational generation of knowledge by systematically collecting data (in real time on a continuous basis) emitted directly from numerous dynamic components pertaining to the regulated environment in order to identify and, if necessary, automatically refine (or prompt refinement of) the system’s operations to attain a pre-specified goal. It provides a descriptive analysis of algorithmic regulation, classifying these decision-making systems as either reactive or pre-emptive, and offers a taxonomy that identifies 8 different forms of algorithmic regulation based on their configuration at each of the three stages of the cybernetic process: notably, at the level of standard setting (adaptive vs fixed behavioural standards); information-gathering and monitoring (historic data vs predictions based on inferred data) and at the level of sanction and behavioural change (automatic execution vs recommender systems). It maps the contours of several emerging debates surrounding algorithmic regulation, drawing upon insights from regulatory governance studies, legal critiques , surveillance studies and critical data studies to highlight various concerns about the legitimacy of algorithmic regulation

KW - big data

KW - algorithm

KW - surveillance

KW - enforcement

KW - automation

U2 - 10.1111/rego.12158

DO - 10.1111/rego.12158

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 505

EP - 523

JO - Regulation & Governance

JF - Regulation & Governance

SN - 1748-5983

IS - 4

ER -