After the MDGs: Citizen Deliberation and the Post-2015 Development Framework

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard

After the MDGs: Citizen Deliberation and the Post-2015 Development Framework. / Wisor, Scott.

In: Ethics & International Affairs, Vol. 26, No. 01, 03.2012, p. 113-133.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{5e5f4db8611e4f9f8af012a766988bb4,
title = "After the MDGs: Citizen Deliberation and the Post-2015 Development Framework",
abstract = "The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), an unprecedented set of global commitments to reduce various forms of human deprivation and promote human development, are set to expire in 2015. Despite their promise, the MDGs are flawed in a variety of ways. The development community is already discussing what improved development framework should replace the MDGs. I argue that global justice advocates should focus first on the procedure for developing the post-2015 development framework. Specifically, they should create spaces for citizens, especially the most marginalized and oppressed, to actively deliberate about the form and content of a future global development framework, and ensure that this deliberation receives political uptake in formal intergovernmental processes for deciding the post-2015 framework.",
author = "Scott Wisor",
year = "2012",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1017/S0892679412000093",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "113--133",
journal = "Ethics & International Affairs",
issn = "0892-6794",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "01",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - After the MDGs: Citizen Deliberation and the Post-2015 Development Framework

AU - Wisor, Scott

PY - 2012/3

Y1 - 2012/3

N2 - The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), an unprecedented set of global commitments to reduce various forms of human deprivation and promote human development, are set to expire in 2015. Despite their promise, the MDGs are flawed in a variety of ways. The development community is already discussing what improved development framework should replace the MDGs. I argue that global justice advocates should focus first on the procedure for developing the post-2015 development framework. Specifically, they should create spaces for citizens, especially the most marginalized and oppressed, to actively deliberate about the form and content of a future global development framework, and ensure that this deliberation receives political uptake in formal intergovernmental processes for deciding the post-2015 framework.

AB - The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), an unprecedented set of global commitments to reduce various forms of human deprivation and promote human development, are set to expire in 2015. Despite their promise, the MDGs are flawed in a variety of ways. The development community is already discussing what improved development framework should replace the MDGs. I argue that global justice advocates should focus first on the procedure for developing the post-2015 development framework. Specifically, they should create spaces for citizens, especially the most marginalized and oppressed, to actively deliberate about the form and content of a future global development framework, and ensure that this deliberation receives political uptake in formal intergovernmental processes for deciding the post-2015 framework.

U2 - 10.1017/S0892679412000093

DO - 10.1017/S0892679412000093

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 113

EP - 133

JO - Ethics & International Affairs

JF - Ethics & International Affairs

SN - 0892-6794

IS - 01

ER -