A systematic review of methods used to sample and analyse periradicular tissue fluid during root canal treatment

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Colleges, School and Institutes

External organisations

  • University of Birmingham

Abstract

AIM: The primary aim was to identify techniques used to sample and analyse Periradicular Tissue Fluid (PTF) in permanent teeth diagnosed with apical disease during root canal treatment. Secondly, to identify the types of inflammatory mediators studied using this approach.

METHODOLOGY: 

DATA SOURCES: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, Web of Science and OpenGrey.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Clinical studies published until 1st June 2018 which utilised orthograde techniques to sample and analyse PTF were included. Cell culture, laboratory or animal studies and those concerned with investigating inflammatory mediator activity from within healthy or diseased pulp tissue, and not periradicular tissues, were excluded.

STUDY APPRASIAL & METHODS: In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, data was extracted on study characteristics, target mediators, sampling and assay techniques and the parameters associated with the PTF sampling and eluting protocol. A qualitative synthesis was conducted and studies were critically appraised using a modified version of the Cochrane risk of bias tool.

RESULTS: 

STUDY CHARACTERSITCS: From 251 studies, 33 were eligible for inclusion. Sampling techniques included the use of paper points (n=27), fine needle aspiration (n=4) and filter strips (n=2). Assay techniques included Enzyme-linked-immunosorbant-assay (n=18), quantitative polymerase chain reaction (n=9), radioimmunoassay (n=4), colorimetric-assay (n=2), immunofluorometric-assay (n=1) and cytometric-bead-array (n=1). Forty-five different inflammatory mediators were targeted at the proteomic/metabolomic (n=25) or transcriptomic level (n=9).

LIMITATIONS: Significant heterogeneity exists within the methodology and only 5 studies disclosed unambiguous information about their PTF sampling and eluting protocols.

CONCLUSIONS: Paper points and proteomic/metabolomic analysis are currently the preferred methods for studying and analysing PTF during NSRCT. The most studied analytes were IL-1β and TNF-α.

IMPLICATIONS: Further research is required to develop an optimised PTF sampling and eluting protocol to overcome methodological heterogeneity and future studies are advised to follow a standardised approach to reporting data. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.


Bibliographic note

© 2019 International Endodontic Journal. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1108-1127
Number of pages20
JournalInternational Endodontic Journal
Volume52
Issue number8
Early online date25 Feb 2019
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2019

Keywords

  • Endodontics, periradicular tissue fluid, cytokine, inflammation, sampling, systematic review