A proposed framework for developing quality assessment tools

Penny Whiting, Robert Wolff, Susan Mallett, Iveta Simera, Jelena Savović

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)
260 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Assessment of the quality of included studies is an essential component of any systematic review. A formal quality assessment is facilitated by using a structured tool. There are currently no guidelines available for researchers wanting to develop a new quality assessment tool.

METHODS: This paper provides a framework for developing quality assessment tools based on our experiences of developing a variety of quality assessment tools for studies of differing designs over the last 14 years. We have also drawn on experience from the work of the EQUATOR Network in producing guidance for developing reporting guidelines.

RESULTS: We do not recommend a single 'best' approach. Instead, we provide a general framework with suggestions as to how the different stages can be approached. Our proposed framework is based around three key stages: initial steps, tool development and dissemination.

CONCLUSIONS: We recommend that anyone who would like to develop a new quality assessment tool follow the stages outlined in this paper. We hope that our proposed framework will increase the number of tools developed using robust methods.

Original languageEnglish
Article number204
JournalSystematic Reviews
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Oct 2017

Keywords

  • Journal Article
  • risk of bias
  • systematic reviews
  • quality

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A proposed framework for developing quality assessment tools'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this