A comparison of government communication of climate change in Hong Kong and United Kingdom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard

A comparison of government communication of climate change in Hong Kong and United Kingdom. / Ferranti, Emma; Wong, Joanna Ho Yan; Dhesi, Surindar.

In: Weather, Climate, and Society, Vol. 13, No. 2, 01.04.2021, p. 287–302.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{00cc954b3eeb4a73b0ad6c5cb141c3b4,
title = "A comparison of government communication of climate change in Hong Kong and United Kingdom",
abstract = "As leaders of civil society, governments have a prime responsibility to communicate climate change information in order to motivate their citizens to mitigate and adapt. This study compares the approaches of the United Kingdom (UK) and Hong Kong (HK) governments. Although different in size and population, the UK and HK have similar climate change agendas to communicate to similarly educated and prosperous populations. The study finds that whilst both governments use similar means: policy, education, campaigns, internet and social media, these have different characteristics, with different emphases in their climate change message. The UK{\textquoteright}s top-down approach is more prominent in its legally binding policy and well-defined programmes for adaptation and risk assessment. HK has more effectively embedded climate change education across the school curricula, and has a more centralized and consistently branded campaign, with widespread use of visual language to connect the public to the problem. HK frames climate change as a science-society problem, and has a greater focus on self-responsibility and bottom-up behavioral change. Thus, the UK and HK governments have polarized approaches to motivating their citizens into climate action. Moving forwards, both governments should consider best practice elements of the other to develop their communication of climate change.",
author = "Emma Ferranti and Wong, {Joanna Ho Yan} and Surindar Dhesi",
year = "2021",
month = apr,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1175/WCAS-D-20-0123.1",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "287–302",
journal = "Weather, Climate, and Society",
issn = "1948-8327",
publisher = "American Meteorological Society",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of government communication of climate change in Hong Kong and United Kingdom

AU - Ferranti, Emma

AU - Wong, Joanna Ho Yan

AU - Dhesi, Surindar

PY - 2021/4/1

Y1 - 2021/4/1

N2 - As leaders of civil society, governments have a prime responsibility to communicate climate change information in order to motivate their citizens to mitigate and adapt. This study compares the approaches of the United Kingdom (UK) and Hong Kong (HK) governments. Although different in size and population, the UK and HK have similar climate change agendas to communicate to similarly educated and prosperous populations. The study finds that whilst both governments use similar means: policy, education, campaigns, internet and social media, these have different characteristics, with different emphases in their climate change message. The UK’s top-down approach is more prominent in its legally binding policy and well-defined programmes for adaptation and risk assessment. HK has more effectively embedded climate change education across the school curricula, and has a more centralized and consistently branded campaign, with widespread use of visual language to connect the public to the problem. HK frames climate change as a science-society problem, and has a greater focus on self-responsibility and bottom-up behavioral change. Thus, the UK and HK governments have polarized approaches to motivating their citizens into climate action. Moving forwards, both governments should consider best practice elements of the other to develop their communication of climate change.

AB - As leaders of civil society, governments have a prime responsibility to communicate climate change information in order to motivate their citizens to mitigate and adapt. This study compares the approaches of the United Kingdom (UK) and Hong Kong (HK) governments. Although different in size and population, the UK and HK have similar climate change agendas to communicate to similarly educated and prosperous populations. The study finds that whilst both governments use similar means: policy, education, campaigns, internet and social media, these have different characteristics, with different emphases in their climate change message. The UK’s top-down approach is more prominent in its legally binding policy and well-defined programmes for adaptation and risk assessment. HK has more effectively embedded climate change education across the school curricula, and has a more centralized and consistently branded campaign, with widespread use of visual language to connect the public to the problem. HK frames climate change as a science-society problem, and has a greater focus on self-responsibility and bottom-up behavioral change. Thus, the UK and HK governments have polarized approaches to motivating their citizens into climate action. Moving forwards, both governments should consider best practice elements of the other to develop their communication of climate change.

U2 - 10.1175/WCAS-D-20-0123.1

DO - 10.1175/WCAS-D-20-0123.1

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 287

EP - 302

JO - Weather, Climate, and Society

JF - Weather, Climate, and Society

SN - 1948-8327

IS - 2

ER -