Abstract
There are good-quality reviews and poor-quality reviews. We have used the six C?s as a framework for outlining some of the principles of a helpful review: helpful for author, editor and journal. However, because we know there is a correlation between good-quality reviews and the publication of good quality papers, the implications extend further. We have a collective responsibility to make sure that we do not allow poor science to creep into our discipline. Writing a helpful review is an important way of contributing to this process.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2695-2697 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Journal of Clinical Nursing |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue number | 19-20 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2014 |