Abstract
There are good-quality reviews and poor-quality reviews. We have used the six C?s as a framework for outlining some of the principles of a helpful review: helpful for author, editor and journal. However, because we know there is a correlation between good-quality reviews and the publication of good quality papers, the implications extend further. We have a collective responsibility to make sure that we do not allow poor science to creep into our discipline. Writing a helpful review is an important way of contributing to this process.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 2695-2697 |
Number of pages | 3 |
Journal | Journal of Clinical Nursing |
Volume | 23 |
Issue number | 19-20 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2014 |