Work‐from‐home and the risk of securities misconduct

Douglas Cumming*, Chris Firth, John Gathergood, Neil Stewart

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

46 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In the wake of the global pandemic, a challenge for CEOs and boards is to set a stakeholder-acceptable organizational balance between remote and traditional office working. However, the risks of work-from-home are not yet fully understood. We describe competing theories that predict the effect on misconduct of a corporate shift to work-from-home. Using internal bank data on securities traders we exploit lockdown variation induced by emergency regulation of the Covid-19 pandemic. Our difference-in-differences analysis reveals that working from home lowers the likelihood of securities misconduct; ultimately those working from home exhibit fewer misconduct alerts. The economic significance of these changes is large. Our study makes an important step toward understanding the link between the balance of work locations and the risk that comes with this tradeoff.
Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Financial Management
Early online date6 May 2023
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 6 May 2023

Keywords

  • fraud, risk management
  • securities misconduct
  • surveillance
  • work‐from‐home

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Work‐from‐home and the risk of securities misconduct'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this