Why textual criticism is more exciting than watching mould grow on old bread: Review: Robert B. Stewart (ed.), Bart D. Ehrman & Daniel B. Wallace in Dialogue: The Reliability of the New Testament, (Fortress Press, 2011). In: The Expository Times 124/2 (11/2012)

Christina M Kreinecker

Why textual criticism is more exciting than watching mould grow on old bread: Review: Robert B. Stewart (ed.), Bart D. Ehrman & Daniel B. Wallace in Dialogue: The Reliability of the New Testament, (Fortress Press, 2011). In: The Expository Times 124/2 (11/2012)

Christina M Kreinecker

Philosophy, Theology and Religion

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	99–100
Number of pages	2
Journal	The Expository Times
Volume	2
Issue number	124
Publication status	Published - 2012

FP7 ERC - COMPAUL : The Earliest Commentaries on Paul as Sources for the Biblical Text
Houghton, H. (Principal Investigator) & Parker, D. (Co-Investigator)
European Commission
1/10/11 → 30/09/16
Project: EU

Cite this

@article{d440c8c7b40e4fec8070a1fd34f0d23f,

title = "Why textual criticism is more exciting than watching mould grow on old bread: Review: Robert B. Stewart (ed.), Bart D. Ehrman & Daniel B. Wallace in Dialogue: The Reliability of the New Testament, (Fortress Press, 2011). In: The Expository Times 124/2 (11/2012)",

author = "Kreinecker, {Christina M}",

year = "2012",

language = "English",

volume = "2",

pages = "99–100",

journal = "The Expository Times",

issn = "0014-5246",

publisher = "SAGE Publications",

number = "124",

}

Why textual criticism is more exciting than watching mould grow on old bread: Review: Robert B. Stewart (ed.), Bart D. Ehrman & Daniel B. Wallace in Dialogue: The Reliability of the New Testament, (Fortress Press, 2011). In: The Expository Times 124/2 (11/2012). / Kreinecker, Christina M.
In: The Expository Times, Vol. 2, No. 124, 2012, p. 99–100.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why textual criticism is more exciting than watching mould grow on old bread

T2 - Review: Robert B. Stewart (ed.), Bart D. Ehrman & Daniel B. Wallace in Dialogue: The Reliability of the New Testament, (Fortress Press, 2011). In: The Expository Times 124/2 (11/2012)

AU - Kreinecker, Christina M

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

M3 - Review article

SN - 0014-5246

VL - 2

SP - 99

EP - 100

JO - The Expository Times

JF - The Expository Times

IS - 124

ER -

Why textual criticism is more exciting than watching mould grow on old bread: Review: Robert B. Stewart (ed.), Bart D. Ehrman & Daniel B. Wallace in Dialogue: The Reliability of the New Testament, (Fortress Press, 2011). In: The Expository Times 124/2 (11/2012)

Projects

FP7 ERC - COMPAUL : The Earliest Commentaries on Paul as Sources for the Biblical Text

Cite this