Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Who's challenging who training for staff empathy towards adults with challenging behaviour: cluster randomised controlled trial

  • R. P. Hastings*
  • , D. Gillespie
  • , S. Flynn
  • , R. McNamara
  • , Z. Taylor
  • , R. Knight
  • , E. Randell
  • , L. Richards
  • , G. Moody
  • , A. Mitchell
  • , P. Przybylak
  • , B. Williams
  • , P. H. Hunt
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: One in five adults with intellectual disabilities (ID) known to services display challenging behaviours (CBs), and these individuals are at risk for restrictive practices and poor care. Staff attitudes may contribute to the development and/or maintenance of CBs. We investigated the effectiveness of co-produced Who's Challenging Who? training delivered by people with ID to staff. Method: This study involved a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) of Who's Challenging Who? training with follow-up at six and 20 weeks post-randomisation. Participants: two staff from each of 118 residential care settings for adults with ID at least one of whom displayed aggressive CB. Primary outcome: Self-reported Staff Empathy for people with Challenging Behaviour Questionnaire. Analysis: intention to treat of all randomised settings. ISCRTN registration: ISRCTN53763600. Results: 118 residential settings (including 236 staff) were randomised to either receive training (59 settings) or to receive training after a delay (59 settings). The primary analysis included data from 121 staff in 76 settings (51% of staff, 64% of settings). The adjusted mean difference on the transformed (cubed) Staff Empathy for people with Challenging Behaviour Questionnaire score at the primary end point was 1073.2 (95% CI: -938.1 to 3084.5, P = 0.296) in favour of the intervention group (effect size Cohen's d =.19). Conclusions: This is the first large-scale RCT of a co-produced training course delivered by people with ID. Findings indicated a small positive (but statistically non-significant) effect on increased staff empathy at 20 weeks, and small to moderate effects for staff reported secondary outcomes in favour of the intervention group.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)798-813
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Intellectual Disability Research
Volume62
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2018

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Authors. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research published by MENCAP and International Association of the Scientific Study of Intellectual and Developmental Disibilities and John Wiley & Sons Ltd

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • burnout
  • challenging behaviour
  • empathy
  • randomised controlled trial
  • staff training
  • work stress

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Who's challenging who training for staff empathy towards adults with challenging behaviour: cluster randomised controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this