When choice becomes limited: Women's experiences of delay in labour

Sara Kenyon, Natalie Armstrong

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    5 Citations (Scopus)
    118 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Choice and patient involvement in decision-making are strong aspirations of contemporary healthcare. One of the most striking areas in which this is played out is maternity care where recent policy has focused on choice and supporting normal birth. However, birth is sometimes not straightforward and unanticipated complications can rapidly reduce choice. We draw on the accounts of women who experienced delay during labour with their first child. This occurs when progress is slow, and syntocinon is administered to strengthen and regulate contractions. Once delay has been recognized, the clinical circumstances limit choice. Drawing on Mol's work on the logics of choice and care, we explore how, although often upsetting, women accepted that their choices and plans were no longer feasible. The majority were happy to defer to professionals who they regarded as having the necessary technical expertise, while some adopted a more traditional medical model and actively rejected involvement in decision-making altogether. Only a minority wanted to continue active involvement in decision-making, although the extent to which the possibility existed for them to do so was questionable. Women appeared to accept that their ideals of choice and involvement had to be abandoned, and that clinical circumstances legitimately changed events.

    Original languageEnglish
    JournalHealth
    Early online date9 Dec 2015
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Keywords

    • choice
    • maternity
    • qualitative
    • United Kingdom

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'When choice becomes limited: Women's experiences of delay in labour'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this