Abstract
Stigma is defined as "a mark placed on a person, place, technology, or product associated with a particular attribute that identifies it as different and deviant, flawed or undesirable" and results in elevated risk perceptions. Here, Liao et al argue that an anthropomorphized virus (vs. non- anthropomorphized) is less random and more likely to serve as a social marker. This makes sense because anthropomorphism has been proved as a powerful tool to access human schema, apply social norm and make social belief more available. They argue that virus anthropomorphism (vs. non-anthropomorphism) can lead to greater stigma toward patients. Furthermore, they demonstrate that defensive attribution is the underlying mechanism.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 78-78 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Journal | Advances in Consumer Research |
| Volume | 50 |
| Publication status | Published - 22 Oct 2022 |
| Event | 53rd Annual Conference of the Association for Consumer Research (ACR) - Sheraton Downtown, Denver, United States Duration: 20 Oct 2022 → 22 Oct 2022 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'When and how virus anthropomorphism intensifies consumer stigma toward patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver