What's Wrong with Wishful Thinking? “Manifesting” as an Epistemic Vice

Laura D'Olimpio*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    30 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The popular trend of manifesting involves supposedly making something happen by imagining it and consciously thinking it will happen in order to will it into existence. In this paper Laura D'Olimpio explains why manifesting is a form of wishful thinking and argues that it is an epistemic vice. She describes how such wishful thinking generally, and manifesting in particular, are epistemically problematic in the ways they obstruct the attainment of knowledge. She further adds that manifesting leaves the epistemic agent vulnerable to unrealistic expectations, being set up for failure, and being prone to self‐blame, and it also encourages a blurring of the distinction between thought and truth. D'Olimpio offers an example that demonstrates how manifesting as a particular instantiation of wishful thinking invites and encourages obsessive and compulsive habits and rituals that corrupt the epistemic agent's rational conclusions. Wishful thinking and manifesting negate the role for luck and privilege in achievement and downplay the role of effort and action. D'Olimpio concludes that as educators we may play a role in dispelling the myth that manifesting is a virtuous or beneficial practice and instead teach our students that, as a form of wishful thinking, it is an epistemic vice best avoided.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number12653
    Number of pages16
    JournalEducational Theory
    Early online date7 Jun 2024
    DOIs
    Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 7 Jun 2024

    Keywords

    • philosophy of education
    • epistemic vice
    • wishful thinking
    • epistemic agent
    • intellectual vice
    • manifesting

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'What's Wrong with Wishful Thinking? “Manifesting” as an Epistemic Vice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this