Abstract
Raewyn Connell’s theoretical concept of hegemonic masculinity has been profoundly influential in feminist sociology. Despite the rich literature inspired by her theory, conceptual ambiguities have compromised its full potential. In this article, I critique a pessimistic tendency in the interpretation and application of hegemonic masculinity, which focuses on its regressive role in reproducing/legitimating heteronormative patriarchy while overlooking its progressive potential. I propose that revisiting Antonio Gramsci’s theorization of hegemony can help us understand hegemonic masculinity by its mechanism of domination—force accompanied by consent—rather than via certain pregiven masculine qualities. This reformulation of hegemonic masculinity not only pushes us to maintain a relational understanding of masculinities in empirical research, but also brings attention to Connell’s vision for social change.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 318-333 |
| Journal | Sociological Theory |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2020 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'What’s Hegemonic about Hegemonic Masculinity? Legitimation and Beyond'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Prizes
-
ASA Sex & Gender Distinguished Article Award
Yang, Y. (Recipient), Aug 2022
Prize: Prize (including medals and awards)
-
ASA Theory Section Shils-Coleman Award
Yang, Y. (Recipient), Aug 2021
Prize: Prize (including medals and awards)