Abstract
To explain human social sophistication, and proximal phylogenetic steps leading to it, Dunbar claims that mentalising expands to increasingly high levels of recursion. However, the evidential basis for this claim is weak, exposing both a limitation in Dunbar’s account and in the field’s current understanding of social sophistication.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | e164 |
| Journal | Behavioral and Brain Sciences |
| Volume | 48 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - 27 Nov 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press.Type of article: Open Peer Commentary
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
- Physiology
- Behavioral Neuroscience
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'What makes social abilities sophisticated? Not recursive mentalising'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver