What Does Musicology Have to Do With Archiving? Three Experiences of Engagement

Valentina Bertolani, You Nakai, Luisa Santacesaria

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Musical practices derived from post-1960s experimental music created heterogeneous musical materials and traces—including scores, preparations and instrument modifications, electronic instruments, custom-made devices, and recordings. The Romantic work concept on which most traditional musical archives are based is unsuitable to preserve this expanded apparatus of objects and concepts, and rethinking the musical archive is becoming urgent.

This colloquy collected the experiences of three researchers, engaging with five institutions, three creators, and four countries. Yet the archival issues presented are eerily similar. These experiences involve David Tudor (paper-based archive at the Getty Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA, and the David Tudor Instrument Collection at Wesleyan University, Midtown, CT); Mario Bertoncini (paper-based archive at the archive of the Akademie der Künste, Berlin, and his object collection at the moment stored at the Fondazione Isabella Scelsi, Rome); Gayle Young (who still owns all her production).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)111-128
Number of pages18
JournalIntersections Canadian Journal of Music Revue canadienne de musique
Volume40
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Feb 2023

Keywords

  • archiving objects
  • music archive
  • experimental musics
  • musical instruments

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What Does Musicology Have to Do With Archiving? Three Experiences of Engagement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this