Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Weighted min-cut: Sequential, cut-query, and streaming algorithms

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Consider the following 2-respecting min-cut problem. Given any weighted graph G and its spanning tree T, find the minimum cut among the cuts that contain at most two edges in T. This problem is an important subroutine in Karger's celebrated randomized near-linear-time min-cut algorithm [STOC'96]. We present a new approach for this problem which can be easily implemented in many settings, leading to the following randomized min-cut algorithms for weighted graphs. - An O(mlog2 n/loglogn + nlog6 n)-time sequential algorithm improving Karger's long-standing O(m log3 n) and O(nlog6 n + mlog2 nlog(n2/m)/loglogn) bounds when the input graph is not extremely sparse or dense. Improvements over Karger's bounds were previously known only under a rather strong assumption that the input graph is simple (unweighted without parallel edges) [Henzinger, Rao, Wang, SODA'17; Ghaffari, Nowicki, Thorup, SODA'20]. For unweighted graphs (possibly with parallel edges) and using bit operations, our bound can be further improved to O(mlog1.5 n/loglogn + nlog6 n). - An algorithm that requires Õ(n) cut queries to compute the min-cut of a weighted graph: This answers an open problem by Rubinstein, Schramm, and Weinberg [ITCS'18], who obtained a similar bound for simple graphs. Our bound is tight up to polylogarithmic factors. - A streaming algorithm that requires Õ(n) space and O(logn) passes to compute the min-cut: The only previous non-trivial exact min-cut algorithm in this setting is the 2-pass Õ(n)-space algorithm on simple graphs [Rubinstein et al., ITCS'18] (observed by Assadi, Chen, and Khanna [STOC'19]). Our approach exploits some cute structural properties so that it only needs to compute the values of Õ(n) cuts corresponding to removing Õ(n) pairs of tree edges, an operation that can be done quickly in many settings. This is in contrast to the techniques used by Karger and Lovett-Sandlund to solve 2-respecting min-cut where information about many more cuts is computed, stored in and accessed from sophisticated data-structures.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationSTOC 2020 - Proceedings of the 52nd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing
EditorsKonstantin Makarychev, Yury Makarychev, Madhur Tulsiani, Gautam Kamath, Julia Chuzhoy
PublisherAssociation for Computing Machinery
Pages496-509
Number of pages14
ISBN (Electronic)9781450369794
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Jun 2020
Event52nd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2020 - Chicago, United States
Duration: 22 Jun 202026 Jun 2020

Publication series

NameProceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing
ISSN (Print)0737-8017

Conference

Conference52nd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2020
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityChicago
Period22/06/2026/06/20

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 ACM.

Keywords

  • Cut-query model
  • Min-cut
  • Range-query data-structure
  • Sequential model
  • Streaming model

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Software

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Weighted min-cut: Sequential, cut-query, and streaming algorithms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this