Weekend specialist intensity and admission mortality in acute hospital trusts in England: a cross-sectional study

Cassie Aldridge, Julian Bion, Amunpreet Boyal, Yen-Fu Chen, Mike Clancy, Tim Evans, Alan Girling, Joanne Lord, Russell Mannion, Peter Rees, Chris Roseveare, Gavin Rudge, Jianxia Sun, Carolyn Tarrant, Mark Temple, Sam Watson, Richard Lilford, HiSLAC Collaborative

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

68 Citations (Scopus)
341 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increased mortality rates associated with weekend hospital admission (the so-called weekend effect) have been attributed to suboptimum staffing levels of specialist consultants. However, evidence for a causal association is elusive, and the magnitude of the weekend specialist deficit remains unquantified. This uncertainty could hamper efforts by national health systems to introduce 7 day health services. We aimed to examine preliminary associations between specialist intensity and weekend admission mortality across the English National Health Service.

METHODS: Eligible hospital trusts were those in England receiving unselected emergency admissions. On Sunday June 15 and Wednesday June 18, 2014, we undertook a point prevalence survey of hospital specialists (consultants) to obtain data relating to the care of patients admitted as emergencies. We defined specialist intensity at each trust as the self-reported estimated number of specialist hours per ten emergency admissions between 0800 h and 2000 h on Sunday and Wednesday. With use of data for all adult emergency admissions for financial year 2013-14, we compared weekend to weekday admission risk of mortality with the Sunday to Wednesday specialist intensity ratio within each trust. We stratified trusts by size quintile.

FINDINGS: 127 of 141 eligible acute hospital trusts agreed to participate; 115 (91%) trusts contributed data to the point prevalence survey. Of 34,350 clinicians surveyed, 15,537 (45%) responded. Substantially fewer specialists were present providing care to emergency admissions on Sunday (1667 [11%]) than on Wednesday (6105 [42%]). Specialists present on Sunday spent 40% more time caring for emergency patients than did those present on Wednesday (mean 5·74 h [SD 3·39] vs 3·97 h [3·31]); however, the median specialist intensity on Sunday was only 48% (IQR 40-58) of that on Wednesday. The Sunday to Wednesday intensity ratio was less than 0·7 in 104 (90%) of the contributing trusts. Mortality risk among patients admitted at weekends was higher than among those admitted on weekdays (adjusted odds ratio 1·10, 95% CI 1·08-1·11; p<0·0001). There was no significant association between Sunday to Wednesday specialist intensity ratios and weekend to weekday mortality ratios (r -0·042; p=0·654).

INTERPRETATION: This cross-sectional analysis did not detect a correlation between weekend staffing of hospital specialists and mortality risk for emergency admissions. Further investigation is needed to evaluate whole-system secular change during the implementation of 7 day services. Policy makers should exercise caution before attributing the weekend effect mainly to differences in specialist staffing.

FUNDING: National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research Programme.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)178-186
Number of pages9
JournalThe Lancet
Volume388
Issue number10040
Early online date10 May 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Jul 2016

Keywords

  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Emergencies
  • England
  • Health Policy
  • Hospital Mortality
  • Hospitalization
  • Hospitals
  • Humans
  • Odds Ratio
  • Personnel Staffing and Scheduling
  • Physicians
  • Specialization
  • State Medicine
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Time Factors
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Weekend specialist intensity and admission mortality in acute hospital trusts in England: a cross-sectional study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this