Abstract
How do dissident, far-right groups overcome the collective action problem inherent to political organisation in order to recruit sufficient activists willing to bear the costs of participation and not free-ride on the participation of others? An original ethnographic study of the UK anti-Islamic street protest organisation, the English Defence League (EDL), shows that it solved the collective action problem by supplying selective incentives to members in the form of the club goods of access to violence, increased self-worth and group solidarity. These benefits were offset against the costs of stigma, time, money and unwanted police attention that also accompanied EDL membership. The personal benefits the EDL provided to its members enabled it to supply what Olson termed the first unit of collective action, but limited its ability to supply the additional units required to build a broader, more mainstream movement.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Political Studies |
| Early online date | 8 Jul 2016 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 8 Jul 2016 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Violence, self-worth, solidarity and stigma: how a dissident, far right group solves the collective action problem'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver