Verbal augmented feedback in the rehabilitation of lower extremity musculoskeletal dysfunctions: a systematic review

Marianne Storberget, Linn Helen J. Grødahl, Suzanne J. Snodgrass, Paulette M. Van Vliet, Nicola Heneghan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
119 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Abstract
Background Verbal augmented feedback (VAF) is commonly used in physiotherapy rehabilitation of individuals with lower extremity musculoskeletal dysfunction or to induce motor learning for injury prevention. Its effectiveness for acquisition, retention and transfer of learning of new skills in this population is unknown.

Objectives First, to investigate the effect of VAF for rehabilitation and prevention of lower extremity musculoskeletal dysfunction. Second, to determine its effect on motor learning and the stages of acquisition, retention and transfer in this population.

Design Systematic review designed in accordance with the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and reported in line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Method MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed and five additional databases were searched to identify primary studies with a focus on VAF for prevention and rehabilitation of lower extremity musculoskeletal dysfunction. One reviewer screened the titles and abstracts. Two reviewers retrieved full text articles for final inclusion. The first reviewer extracted data, whereas the second reviewer audited. Two reviewers independently assessed risk of bias and quality of evidence using Cochrane Collaboration’s tool and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation, respectively.

Results Six studies were included, with a total sample of 304 participants. Participants included patients with lateral ankle sprain (n=76), postoperative ACL reconstruction (n=16) and healthy individuals in injury prevention (n=212). All six studies included acquisition, whereas retention was found in five studies. Only one study examined transfer of the achieved motor learning (n=36). VAF was found to be effective for improving lower extremity biomechanics and postural control with moderate evidence from five studies.

Conclusion VAF should be considered in the rehabilitation of lower extremity musculoskeletal dysfunctions. However, it cannot be unequivocally confirmed that VAF is effective in this population, owing to study heterogeneity and a lack of high-quality evidence. Nevertheless, positive effects on lower extremity biomechanics and postural control have been identified. This suggests that further research into this topic is warranted where an investigation of long-term effects of interventions is required. All stages (acquisition, retention and transfer) should be evaluated.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere000256
JournalBMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine
Volume3
Issue number1
Early online date21 Sept 2017
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 21 Sept 2017

Keywords

  • injury prevention
  • lower extremity
  • motor learning
  • musculoskeletal dysfunction
  • verbal augmented feedback

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Verbal augmented feedback in the rehabilitation of lower extremity musculoskeletal dysfunctions: a systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this