Vaccinating healthcare workers against influenza to protect the vunerable - is it a good use of healthcare resources? A systematic review of the evidence and an economic evaluation

Amanda Burls, Rachel Jordan, Pelham Barton, BL Wake, Esther Albon, B Olowokure, JI Hawker

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    190 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Influenza causes substantial mortality in high-risk groups despite targeted vaccination programmes. This paper considers whether it is worth vaccinating healthcare workers (HCWs) against influenza to protect high-risk patients in a series of systematic reviews and an economic evaluation. Eighteen studies are included. Vaccination was highly effective in HCWs, with minimal adverse effects. Two trials assessed patient mortality after vaccinating HCWs, both of which showed a reduction. Despite recommendations, less than 25% of HCW in Europe and the UK are vaccinated. Five studies looked at programmes to increase uptake; these produced increases of 5%-45%. Published economic evaluations did not include patient benefit; therefore, an economic evaluation using UK data was undertaken. In the base case, vaccination was cost saving (12 pound/vaccinee). In the most pessimistic scenario it cost 405 pound/life-year gained. Effective implementation should be a priority. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)4212-4221
    Number of pages10
    JournalVaccine
    Volume24
    Issue number19
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 8 May 2006

    Keywords

    • influenza vaccination
    • economic evaluation
    • healthcare workers
    • systematic review

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Vaccinating healthcare workers against influenza to protect the vunerable - is it a good use of healthcare resources? A systematic review of the evidence and an economic evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this