Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Utility of a virtual small group cognitive behaviour program for autistic children during the pandemic: evidence from a community-based implementation study

  • Vivian Lee*
  • , Nisha Vashi
  • , Flora Roudbarani
  • , Paula Tablon Modica
  • , Ava Pouyandeh
  • , Teresa Sellitto
  • , Alaa Ibrahim
  • , Stephanie H. Ameis
  • , Alex Elkader
  • , Kylie M. Gray
  • , Connor M. Kerns
  • , Meng Chuan Lai
  • , Johanna Lake
  • , Kendra Thomson
  • , Jonathan A. Weiss
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

50 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Autistic children often experience socioemotional difficulties relating to emotion regulation and mental health problems. Supports for autistic children involve the use of adapted interventions that target emotion regulation and social skills, alongside mental health symptoms. The Secret Agent Society Small Group (SAS: SG), an adapted cognitive behavioural program, has demonstrated efficacy through lab-delivered randomized control trials. However, research is still needed on its effectiveness when delivered by publicly funded, community-based autism providers under real-world ecologically valid conditions, especially within the context of a pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted access to community-based supports and services for autistic children, and programs have adapted their services to online platforms. However, questions remain about the feasibility and clinical utility of evidence-based interventions and services delivered virtually in community-based settings.

Methods: The 9-week SAS: SG program was delivered virtually by seven community-based autism service providers during 2020–2021. The program included the use of computer-based games, role-playing tasks, and home missions. Caregivers completed surveys at three timepoints: pre-, post-intervention, and after a 3-month follow-up session. Surveys assessed caregivers’ perception of the program’s acceptability and level of satisfaction, as well as their child’s social and emotional regulation skills and related mental health challenges.

Results: A total of 77 caregivers (94% gender identity females; Mean = 42.1 years, SD = 6.5 years) and their children (79% gender identity males; Mean = 9.9 years, SD = 1.3 years) completed the SAS: SG program. Caregivers agreed that the program was acceptable (95%) and were highly satisfied (90%). Caregivers reported significant reduction in their child’s emotion reactivity from pre- to post-intervention (-1.78 (95% CI, -3.20 to -0.29), p = 0.01, d = 0.36), that continued to decrease after the 3-month booster session (-1.75 (95% CI, -3.34 to -0.16), p = 0.02, d = 0.33). Similarly, improvements in anxiety symptoms were observed (3.05 (95% CI, 0.72 to 5.36), p = 0.006, d = 0.39).

Conclusions: As online delivery of interventions for autistic children remains popular past the pandemic, our findings shed light on future considerations for community-based services, including therapists and agency leaders, on how best to tailor and optimally deliver virtually based programming.

Trial registration: This study has been registered with ISRCTN Registry (ISRCTN98068608) on 15/09/2023. The study was retroactively registered.

Original languageEnglish
Article number685
Number of pages11
JournalBMC Health Services Research
Volume24
Issue number1
Early online date30 May 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Autism
  • Children
  • Community services
  • Emotional regulation
  • Social skills
  • Virutal CBT

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Utility of a virtual small group cognitive behaviour program for autistic children during the pandemic: evidence from a community-based implementation study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this