USP50 suppresses alternative RecQ helicase use and deleterious DNA2 activity during replication

Hannah L. Mackay, Helen R. Stone, George E. Ronson, Katherine Ellis, Alexander Lanz, Yara Aghabi, Alexandra K. Walker, Katarzyna Starowicz, Alexander J. Garvin, Patrick Van Eijk, Stefan A. Koestler, Elizabeth J. Anthony, Ann Liza Piberger, Anoop S. Chauhan, Poppy Conway-Thomas, Alina Vaitsiankova, Sobana Vijayendran, James F. Beesley, Eva Petermann, Eric J. BrownRuth M. Densham, Simon H. Reed, Felix Dobbs, Marco Saponaro, Joanna R. Morris*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Mammalian DNA replication relies on various DNA helicase and nuclease activities to ensure accurate genetic duplication, but how different helicase and nuclease activities are properly directed remains unclear. Here, we identify the ubiquitin-specific protease, USP50, as a chromatin-associated protein required to promote ongoing replication, fork restart, telomere maintenance, cellular survival following hydroxyurea or pyridostatin treatment, and suppression of DNA breaks near GC-rich sequences. We find that USP50 supports proper WRN-FEN1 localisation at or near stalled replication forks. Nascent DNA in cells lacking USP50 shows increased association of the DNA2 nuclease and RECQL4 and RECQL5 helicases and replication defects in cells lacking USP50, or FEN1 are driven by these proteins. Consequently, suppression of DNA2 or RECQL4/5 improves USP50-depleted cell resistance to agents inducing replicative stress and restores telomere stability. These data define an unexpected regulatory protein that promotes the balance of helicase and nuclease use at ongoing and stalled replication forks.
Original languageEnglish
Article number8102
Number of pages17
JournalNature Communications
Volume15
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Sept 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'USP50 suppresses alternative RecQ helicase use and deleterious DNA2 activity during replication'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this