Abstract
The Global Human Rights Sanctions (GHRS) regime was established by the US in response to the death of Sergei Magnitsky in 2016. It empowered governments to impose sanctions on foreign individuals and entities that committed serious human rights abuses, such as torture. Since then, the regime gained widespread acceptance in First World countries, particularly in the UK, the EU, Canada, and Australia. However, whilst the regime was aimed at human rights violators in general, in practice, it demonstrated a particular bias against state actors from the Third World. This article critically examines the GHRS regime through the lens of Third World Approaches to International Law (TWAIL). It contends that the regime is built on a colonial ontological premise, designed to perpetuate systemic bias against the Third World. To visualise this systemic bias, the article uses electric circuit diagrams that demonstrate the biased architecture of the GHRS regime. The article also highlights how the regime operates on a racial binary that dehumanises the Third World by using human rights as a form of weapon. In so doing, it moves beyond descriptive critique to provide an innovative way of imagining how human rights discourse can serve as an instrument of subordination.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Middle East Critique |
| Early online date | 6 Mar 2026 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 6 Mar 2026 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- sanctions
- discrimination
- TWAIL
- international human rights law
- international law
- critique
- Critical Legal Theory
- Electrical circuits
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Using Electric Circuits to Develop a TWAIL based Critique of the Global Human Rights (Magnitsky) Sanctions Regime'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver