“Unduly Harsh?”: An Empirical Examination of Best Interests Assessments in the Context of Parental Deportation

  • Melanie Griffiths*
  • , Naomi Jackson
  • , Sarah Woodhouse
  • , Nazia Yaqub
  • , Helen Stalford
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

30 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Thousands of people are deported from the UK every year, having served a sentence for a serious criminal offence, it being determined that it is no longer in the public interest for them to remain in the UK. For those who are parents, they can appeal against deportation on grounds that it would breach their right to family life and have an unduly harsh impact on their children. Detailed guidance has emerged, setting out the factors that should be taken into account in determining this question in a manner that is compliant with children’s rights. Drawing on an in-depth analysis of a sample of deportation case files, this paper provides a unique empirical insight into the extent to which this guidance is applied in practice, with a particular reference to children’s rights principles and processes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)690-720
Number of pages31
JournalInternational Journal of Children's Rights
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Oct 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Melanie Griffiths et al., 2024.

Keywords

  • best interests
  • deportation
  • immigration
  • right to family life
  • social workers
  • unduly harsh
  • welfare

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Political Science and International Relations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '“Unduly Harsh?”: An Empirical Examination of Best Interests Assessments in the Context of Parental Deportation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this