Underestimating the value of women: assessing the indirect costs of women with systemic lupus erythematosus. Tri-Nation Study Group

A E Clarke, J Penrod, Y St Pierre, M A Petri, S Manzi, D A Isenberg, J L Senecal, P R Fortin, N Sutcliffe, J R Goulet, D Choquette, T Grodzicky, J M Esdaile, Caroline Gordon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Indirect costs result from diminished productivity and are incorporated in cost-benefit analysis to guide health resource allocation. Valuing the productivity impairment of those not involved in labor market activities is controversial but important for diseases affecting predominantly women if allocation decisions are to be economically efficient and equitable. We compared indirect costs incurred by women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), a prototypical women's disease, calculated under varying assumptions for the value of diminished labor market and non-labor market activity.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2597-604
Number of pages8
JournalThe Journal of Rheumatology
Volume27
Issue number11
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2000

Keywords

  • Absenteeism
  • Adult
  • Cost of Illness
  • Employment
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
  • Middle Aged
  • Women's Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Underestimating the value of women: assessing the indirect costs of women with systemic lupus erythematosus. Tri-Nation Study Group'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this