Two worries about Educational Goods

Michael Hand

doi:10.1111/1467-9752.12504

Two worries about Educational Goods

Michael Hand

Education and Social Justice

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

219 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this brief comment on Educational Goods, I raise two worries about the authors' proposed normative framework for educational decision‐makers. The first concerns the omission of rationality, or responsiveness to reasons, from the list of educational goods; the second concerns the inclusion of parental interests in the list of independent values.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1371-1374
Journal	Journal of Philosophy of Education
Volume	54
Issue number	5
Early online date	26 Sept 2020
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12504
Publication status	Published - 1 Oct 2020

Access to Document

10.1111/1467-9752.12504Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND)

HandM2020TwoFinal published version, 91.2 KBLicence: Creative Commons: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND)

Cite this

@article{b746645461144719a26e9c701bca2029,

title = "Two worries about Educational Goods",

abstract = "In this brief comment on Educational Goods, I raise two worries about the authors' proposed normative framework for educational decision‐makers. The first concerns the omission of rationality, or responsiveness to reasons, from the list of educational goods; the second concerns the inclusion of parental interests in the list of independent values.",

author = "Michael Hand",

year = "2020",

month = oct,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1111/1467-9752.12504",

language = "English",

volume = "54",

pages = "1371--1374",

journal = "Journal of Philosophy of Education",

issn = "0309-8249",

publisher = "Wiley",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Two worries about Educational Goods

AU - Hand, Michael

PY - 2020/10/1

Y1 - 2020/10/1

N2 - In this brief comment on Educational Goods, I raise two worries about the authors' proposed normative framework for educational decision‐makers. The first concerns the omission of rationality, or responsiveness to reasons, from the list of educational goods; the second concerns the inclusion of parental interests in the list of independent values.

AB - In this brief comment on Educational Goods, I raise two worries about the authors' proposed normative framework for educational decision‐makers. The first concerns the omission of rationality, or responsiveness to reasons, from the list of educational goods; the second concerns the inclusion of parental interests in the list of independent values.

U2 - 10.1111/1467-9752.12504

DO - 10.1111/1467-9752.12504

M3 - Article

SN - 0309-8249

VL - 54

SP - 1371

EP - 1374

JO - Journal of Philosophy of Education

JF - Journal of Philosophy of Education

IS - 5

ER -

Two worries about Educational Goods

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this