Twelve key findings in deliberative democracy research

Nicole Curato; John S. Dryzek; Selen A. Ercan; Carolyn M. Hendriks; Simon Niemeyer

doi:10.1162/DAED_a_00444

Twelve key findings in deliberative democracy research

Nicole Curato
, John S. Dryzek
, Selen A. Ercan
, Carolyn M. Hendriks
, Simon Niemeyer

Public Administration and Policy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This essay reflects on the development of the field of deliberative democracy by discussing twelve key findings that capture a number of resolved issues in normative theory, conceptual clarification, and associated empirical results. We argue that these findings deserve to be more widely recognized and viewed as a foundation for future practice and research. We draw on our own research and that of others in the field.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	28-38
Number of pages	11
Journal	Daedalus
Volume	146
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_a_00444
Publication status	Published - 1 Jul 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 by the American Academy of Arts & Sciences.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Political Science and International Relations
History and Philosophy of Science

Access to Document

10.1162/DAED_a_00444

Cite this

@article{906e05ee11694445b0f340b79c9b09ee,

title = "Twelve key findings in deliberative democracy research",

abstract = "This essay reflects on the development of the field of deliberative democracy by discussing twelve key findings that capture a number of resolved issues in normative theory, conceptual clarification, and associated empirical results. We argue that these findings deserve to be more widely recognized and viewed as a foundation for future practice and research. We draw on our own research and that of others in the field.",

author = "Nicole Curato and Dryzek, \{John S.\} and Ercan, \{Selen A.\} and Hendriks, \{Carolyn M.\} and Simon Niemeyer",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017 by the American Academy of Arts \& Sciences.",

year = "2017",

month = jul,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1162/DAED\_a\_00444",

language = "English",

volume = "146",

pages = "28--38",

journal = "Daedalus",

issn = "0011-5266",

publisher = "MIT Press",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Twelve key findings in deliberative democracy research

AU - Curato, Nicole

AU - Dryzek, John S.

AU - Ercan, Selen A.

AU - Hendriks, Carolyn M.

AU - Niemeyer, Simon

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - This essay reflects on the development of the field of deliberative democracy by discussing twelve key findings that capture a number of resolved issues in normative theory, conceptual clarification, and associated empirical results. We argue that these findings deserve to be more widely recognized and viewed as a foundation for future practice and research. We draw on our own research and that of others in the field.

AB - This essay reflects on the development of the field of deliberative democracy by discussing twelve key findings that capture a number of resolved issues in normative theory, conceptual clarification, and associated empirical results. We argue that these findings deserve to be more widely recognized and viewed as a foundation for future practice and research. We draw on our own research and that of others in the field.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85021822622

U2 - 10.1162/DAED_a_00444

DO - 10.1162/DAED_a_00444

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85021822622

SN - 0011-5266

VL - 146

SP - 28

EP - 38

JO - Daedalus

JF - Daedalus

IS - 3

ER -

Twelve key findings in deliberative democracy research

Abstract

Bibliographical note

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this