True colours or red herrings? colour maps for finite-element analysis in palaeontological studies to enhance interpretation and accessibility

Stephan Lautenschlager*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

84 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Accessibility is a key aspect for the presentation of research data. In palaeontology, new data is routinely obtained with computational techniques, such as finite-element analysis (FEA). FEA is used to calculate stress and deformation in objects when subjected to external forces. Results are displayed using contour plots in which colour information is used to convey the underlying biomechanical data. The Rainbow colour map is nearly exclusively used for these contour plots in palaeontological studies. However, numerous studies in other disciplines have shown the Rainbow map to be problematic due to uneven colour representation and its inaccessibility for those with colour vision deficiencies. Here, different colour maps were tested for their accuracy in representing values of FEA models. Differences in stress magnitudes (ΔS) and colour values (ΔE) of subsequent points from the FEA models were compared and their correlation was used as a measure of accuracy. The results confirm that the Rainbow colour map is not well suited to represent the underlying stress distribution of FEA models with other colour maps showing a higher discriminative power. As the performance of the colour maps varied with tested scenarios/stress types, it is recommended to use different colour maps for specific purposes.
Original languageEnglish
Article number211357
Number of pages15
JournalRoyal Society Open Science
Volume8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Nov 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'True colours or red herrings? colour maps for finite-element analysis in palaeontological studies to enhance interpretation and accessibility'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this