Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Trends in costs and prescribing for liothyronine and levothyroxine in England and wales 2011–2020

  • Michael Stedman
  • , Peter Taylor
  • , Lakdasa Premawardhana
  • , Onyebuchi Okosieme
  • , Colin Dayan
  • , Adrian H. Heald*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: Recent prescribing policies in England and Wales have imposed significant restrictions on liothyronine prescribing in general practice driven by the prohibitive costs and uncertain benefits of liothyronine in the management of hypothyroidism. However, the impact of these policies on liothyronine usage and costs is still unclear.

Methods: Data were downloaded from the NHS monthly General Practice Prescribing Data in England and from the Comparative Analysis System for Prescribing Audit (CASPA) in Wales for 2011–2020. Trends over the period in amount and costs of levothyroxine and liothyronine prescribing were analysed.

Results: The total medication costs per year for England Wales for hypothyroidism rose from £60.8 million to £129.8 million in 2015–16 and have since reduced to £88.4 million. Levothyroxine prescriptions have been growing above the population growth rate at 0.7%/annum in England and 1.1% in Wales. The costs/patient/year for liothyronine rose from £550 to £3000 in 2015–16 and has since fallen to £2500. Use of liothyronine as a percentage of levothyroxine started to fall in 2015–16 at 7%/annum in England and 3% in Wales. Nevertheless, 0.5% of levothyroxine-treated patients continue to receive liothyronine. All Clinical Commission Groups (CCGs) in England continue to have at least one liothyronine prescribing practice and 48.5% of English general practices prescribed liothyronine in 2019–20.

Conclusion: In spite of strenuous attempts to limit prescribing of liothyronine in general practice, a significant number of patients continue to receive this therapy. The price differential of liothyronine vs levothyroxine should be examined again in light of the continuing use of liothyronine.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)980-989
Number of pages10
JournalClinical Endocrinology
Volume94
Issue number6
Early online date7 Jan 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2021

Bibliographical note

Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. Clinical Endocrinology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • comparison
  • levothyroxine
  • liothyronine
  • prescribing
  • T3
  • T4
  • trends

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Endocrinology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Trends in costs and prescribing for liothyronine and levothyroxine in England and wales 2011–2020'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this