Travel-associated carbapenem-resistant organisms at a time of increasing geopolitical instability: a UK perspective

  • Scott J.C. Pallett*
  • , Sara E. Boyd
  • , Aakash Khanijau
  • , Rishi Banerjee
  • , Nicola Reece
  • , Sarah Jawad
  • , Victoria Daniel
  • , Matthew Routledge
  • , Harin Navalan
  • , Christopher Ward
  • , Kordo Saeed
  • , Jonathan Lambourne
  • , David A. Enoch
  • , Gabriella Shanks
  • , James Cai
  • , Anna Wild
  • , Nikunj Mahida
  • , Heather Hiles
  • , Helena Parsons
  • , Maya Tickell-Painter
  • Robert Shorten, Vino Srirathan, Joe Suich, Deborah Wearmouth, Rishi Dhillon, Nabeela Mughal, Stephen D. Woolley, Matthew K. O'Shea, Luke S.P. Moore
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Conflict and catastrophe compromise multinational healthcare delivery and present risks for the spread of carbapenem-resistant organisms (CROs). UK risk and ability to detect travel-associated CROs remains unclear.

Methods: A 10-question survey was sent to microbiology/infection prevention & control (IPC) practitioners of 108 UK acute NHS Trusts/Regions/Boards, exploring recent experience and IPC practices for travel-associated CROs and approaches to extended-spectrum antimicrobial testing. Additionally, major trauma network centres were invited to review detected carbapenemase-producing organism (CPO) molecular data from March 2022-April 2024, comparing associated travel by WHO global region using one-way ANOVA.

Results: Seventy-three surveys were returned. IPC approaches were highly variable, with 19/73 (26.0%) centres requiring modification to national screening guidelines. 24/73 (32.8%) centres reported CROs associated with recent travel to major conflict areas. Twelve major trauma network centres contributed to review of detected CPOs, finding 297/1290 (23.0%) individuals with travel to 52 different countries. 227/297 (76.4%) were screening results; 279/297 (93.9%) were Enterobacterales. 112/297 (37.7%) had travelled to Europe, where carbapenemase diversity was greater than elsewhere (p<0.001).

Interpretation: A considerable range of UK centres are detecting CROs associated with travel to areas of current major conflict. A more didactic approach to travel history on first contact with healthcare services is required to stratify CPO risk at admission. These data should be collected prospectively in parallel with projects which successfully embed taking an effective travel history to assess risk of travel-associated infectious disease. This will allow clearer understanding of travel behaviours and trends, delineate risk and inform effective IPC.

Original languageEnglish
JournalThe Journal of Hospital Infection
Early online date16 Dec 2025
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 16 Dec 2025

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Keywords

  • Antimicrobial resistance
  • infection prevention and control
  • surveillance
  • screening
  • global health security

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Travel-associated carbapenem-resistant organisms at a time of increasing geopolitical instability: a UK perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this