Towards a consensus view on understanding nanomaterials hazards and managing exposure: Knowledge gaps and recommendations

Geoffrey Hunt, I. Lynch, F. Cassee, T.F. Fernandes, M. Berges, T.A.J. Kuhlbusch, M. Dusinska, M. Riediker, Richard Handy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this article is to present an overview of salient issues of exposure, characterisation and hazard assessment of nanomaterials as they emerged from the consensus-building of experts undertaken within the four year European Commission coordination project NanoImpactNet. The approach adopted is to consolidate and condense the findings and problem-identification in such a way as to identify knowledge-gaps and generate a set of interim recommendations of use to industry, regulators, research bodies and funders. The categories of recommendation arising from the consensual view address: significant gaps in vital factual knowledge of exposure, characterisation and hazards; the development, dissemination and standardisation of appropriate laboratory protocols; address a wide range of technical issues in establishing an adequate risk assessment platform; the more efficient and coordinated gathering of basic data; greater inter-organisational cooperation; regulatory harmonization; the wider use of the life-cycle approaches; and the wider involvement of all stakeholders in the discussion and solution-finding efforts for nanosafety.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1090-1117
Number of pages28
JournalMaterials
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2013

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Towards a consensus view on understanding nanomaterials hazards and managing exposure: Knowledge gaps and recommendations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this