Time to talk about menstruation: a response

Julie Henegan; Belen Torondel; Penelope A  Phillips-Howard; Marni  Sommer; Paul Montgomery

Time to talk about menstruation: a response

Julie Henegan, Belen Torondel, Penelope A Phillips-Howard, Marni Sommer, Paul Montgomery

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We applaud The Lancet for its Editorial (June 10, p 2264)1 that emphasised the need to talk about menstruation. The Editorial highlighted this neglected issue and supports breaking the silence.2 However, we are concerned that some of the statements made are not substantiated by evidence from rigorous studies.

Original language	English
Journal	The Lancet
Volume	389
Issue number	10086
Publication status	Published - 2017

Access to Document

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31950-5Licence: None: All rights reserved

Cite this

@article{ff80c306345a40f990dce4f2bc473730,

title = "Time to talk about menstruation: a response",

abstract = "We applaud The Lancet for its Editorial (June 10, p 2264)1 that emphasised the need to talk about menstruation. The Editorial highlighted this neglected issue and supports breaking the silence.2 However, we are concerned that some of the statements made are not substantiated by evidence from rigorous studies.",

author = "Julie Henegan and Belen Torondel and Phillips-Howard, {Penelope A} and Marni Sommer and Paul Montgomery",

year = "2017",

language = "English",

volume = "389",

journal = "The Lancet",

issn = "0140-6736",

publisher = "Elsevier",

number = "10086",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Time to talk about menstruation: a response

AU - Henegan, Julie

AU - Torondel, Belen

AU - Phillips-Howard, Penelope A

AU - Sommer, Marni

AU - Montgomery, Paul

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - We applaud The Lancet for its Editorial (June 10, p 2264)1 that emphasised the need to talk about menstruation. The Editorial highlighted this neglected issue and supports breaking the silence.2 However, we are concerned that some of the statements made are not substantiated by evidence from rigorous studies.

AB - We applaud The Lancet for its Editorial (June 10, p 2264)1 that emphasised the need to talk about menstruation. The Editorial highlighted this neglected issue and supports breaking the silence.2 However, we are concerned that some of the statements made are not substantiated by evidence from rigorous studies.

M3 - Article

SN - 0140-6736

VL - 389

JO - The Lancet

JF - The Lancet

IS - 10086

ER -

Time to talk about menstruation: a response

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this