Theorizing, Deleuzian-style

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

200 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

There is a difference between theory and theorizing. One way or another, theory is central to the organization of most academic disciplines: for example, as a framework of concepts that expresses preoccupations, that codifies linkages, that relates discoveries, that raises questions. But theorizing is the becoming of theory: for example, running into problems, feeling perplexity, creating space, forming concepts, finding time, condensing frameworks, forcing conclusions – a living reality that is (for reasons explored below) neglected as a topic of inquiry. I address this deficiency here by engaging with theorizing as a legitimate, perhaps inescapable theme, albeit one that remains elusive and that must as far as possible be grasped directly as it occurs. In developing this engagement, I suggest that the philosophy of Deleuze and Guattari offers an appropriate point of departure and – through a reading of Difference and Repetition and What is Philosophy?, and through a synthesis of this with the experience of theorizing – I draw out the components of a Deleuzian theory of theorizing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)545-560
Number of pages16
JournalCultural Geographies
Volume27
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Dec 2019

Keywords

  • Deleuze
  • Spinoza
  • critique
  • expression
  • theorizing
  • theory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Cultural Studies
  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Theorizing, Deleuzian-style'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this