The validity of the monocentric city model in a polycentric age : US metropolitan areas in 1990, 2000 and 2010

Daniel Arribas-bel, Fernando Sanz-gracia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

56 Citations (Scopus)
454 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this article, we use local indicators of spatial association (LISA) and other spatial analysis techniques to analyze the distribution of centers with high employment density within metropolitan areas. We examine the 359 metropolitan areas across the United States at three points in time (1990, 2000, and 2010) to provide a spatio-temporal panoramic of urban spatial structure. Our analysis highlights three key findings. (1) The monocentric structure persists in a majority of metropolitan areas: 56.5% in 1990, 64.1% in 2000, and 57.7% in 2010. (2) The pattern of employment centers remains stable for most metropolitan areas: the number of centers remained the same for 74.9% of metropolitan areas between 1990 and 2000 and for 85.2% between 2000 and 2010. (3) Compared with monocentric metropolitan areas, polycentric metros are larger and more dense, with higher per-capita incomes and lower poverty rates.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)980-997
JournalUrban Geography
Volume35
Issue number7
Early online date29 Jul 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Oct 2014

Keywords

  • urban spatial structure
  • employment centers
  • local indicators of spatial association (LISA)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The validity of the monocentric city model in a polycentric age : US metropolitan areas in 1990, 2000 and 2010'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this