The species–area relationship in ant ecology

Leo Ohyama, Robert D. Holt, Tom Matthews, Andrea Lucky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Aim: The positive relationship between species richness and area—the species–area relationship (SAR)—is a key principle in ecology. Previous studies show large variation in the SAR across taxa collectively indicating the necessity of a taxon-focused approach to accurately evaluate biodiversity scaling patterns. Ants are ideal for this given their global distribution and role in ecosystem functioning. Using data from insular ant communities, this study quantified and investigated various attributes of ant SARs and reviewed the SAR literature for ant faunas, world-wide, to identify specific areas for improvement.

Location: Islands around the world.

Taxon: Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).

Methods: We aggregated data on species richness and island characteristics from previous studies on ant SARs to evaluate effects of climate, biogeographic realm, and latitude on slope values from these studies. A multimodel inference approach was used to determine the form of the different SARs, and whether there were any differences between mainland and insular SARs. We also assessed differences between mainland and insular SAR slopes and intercepts. To seek a general slope coefficient for ants, we used a mixed-effect model. Finally, we tested for potential thresholds in the global insular SAR using piecewise regression models.

Results: There was a negative relationship between SAR slopes and precipitation in both mainland and insular SARs, while SAR slopes and intercept values were higher in mainland compared to insular systems. Strong evidence of thresholds emerged in the global insular SAR. Finally, a general slope of 0.16 was observed for insular systems, which is lower than found in previous studies.

Main Conclusions: A taxon-focused approach proves to showcase unexpected patterns in the SAR. Ant diversity increases faster across area in mainland areas compared to true islands. The influences of climate and biogeographic realms on the ant SAR warrant deeper study. Our review highlights knowledge gaps in the ant SAR that also extend to other taxa, such as the effects of nonnative species on the SAR.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1824-1841
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Biogeography
Volume48
Issue number8
Early online date2 Jun 2021
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2 Jun 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
We thank David G. Jenkins for consultation on analyses and discussion, Phil Hahn for feedback on the working drafts, Juan D. Bogota for discussion, James Wetterer for sharing unpublished and original data, and Heraldo Vasconcelos for sharing original data. We thank the editor, Leonardo Dapporto, François Rigal, and one anonymous reviewer for providing constructive feedback that helped improve this study. LO was supported by a University of Florida Graduate School Funding Award and a University of Florida Biodiversity Institute Fellowship. RDH thanks the University of Florida Foundation for its support. This work was supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, McIntire Stennis project 10111529. No permits were required for this research.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd

Keywords

  • ants
  • biodiversity
  • fragmentation
  • invasive species
  • island biogeography
  • islands
  • species–area relationship

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The species–area relationship in ant ecology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this