Abstract
In October and November of 2012, the Appeals Chamber of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL) issued two key decisions affirming the legality of the court and the use of trials in absentia of the accused. Highly disputed within Lebanon and throughout the international legal community, both decisions are crucial milestones in the developing history of the STL, and mark critical developments in the evolution of the international justice system and international criminal law.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 163-216 |
| Number of pages | 54 |
| Journal | International Legal Materials |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - 2017 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Special Tribunal for Lebanon, Appeals Chamber: Decisions on the Legality of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon and Trials In Absentia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver