Abstract
In this study, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were performed to calculate the solid–liquid interface (SLI) free energy and its anisotropy of Al using the capillary fluctuation method (CFM) and a third generation of charge-optimized many body (COMB3) potential. The two thresholds (ϕmin, ϕmax) used to define interfacial atoms and the thickness of the bin (Δ) used to define the SLI profile significantly affect the obtained stiffness. The influence of the three parameters is discussed and optimal values for these parameters are also given. The magnitude of the SLI free energy of pure Al at the melting point is found to be 172.67 ± 22.90 mJ/m2 through a detailed discussion of available experimental results. This result is compared with the SLI free energies of Al calculated from the COMB3 potential, two embedded-atom method (EAM) potentials and a modified embedded-atom method (MEAM) potential. It is found that both the COMB3 potential and the MEAM potential give predictions of the SLI free energy very close to the true value, while the EAM potentials underestimate this value quite a lot.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 109910 |
| Journal | Computational Materials Science |
| Volume | 184 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2020 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2020 Elsevier B.V.
Keywords
- COMB3
- EAM
- MEAM
- Molecular dynamics simulation
- Solid–liquid interface free energy
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Computer Science
- General Chemistry
- General Materials Science
- Mechanics of Materials
- General Physics and Astronomy
- Computational Mathematics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The solid–liquid interface free energy of Al: A comparison between molecular dynamics calculations and experimental measurements'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver